Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us!

psaPSA: For those authors who have yet to discover it – Amazon is currently going through and classifying a great deal of romance books as erotica.

Pornocalypse 2015 has begun…

How do I know this? Because they shunted nearly 3/4 of Excessica’s catalog into erotica. All of a sudden my author rank rose to #2 in erotica – sounds great, doesn’t it? What’s the problem? I mean, doesn’t erotica belong in erotica?

Yes. And no. It’s a lot more complicated than that.

Anyone who publishes erotica and/or erotic romance knows that the line can be unclear between what is considered “erotica” and what is considered “erotic romance.” Generally, longer books with a romance focus (i.e. two people falling in love, overcoming obstacle(s) and ending up with their happy ever after, or at least happy for now) even if they have explicit sex in them, are considered romance. Shorter works are a little more dicey, but even short stories can be erotic romance if they have all of those elements I listed above. So who determines what belongs in erotica and what belongs in romance?

Amazon. Their store, their rules, right? The problem is – we all know how inconsistent Amazon is when applying their “guidelines.” Case in point, when they decided that most of our catalog belonged in erotica, they decided to place Hunting Season in erotica. There’s zero sex in that story. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch. It’s horror, not erotica, and that’s where we placed it. But Amazon, in their infinite wisdom, decided to place it in erotica.


Does this look like it belongs in the “erotica” category to you?

That alone tells me that Amazon clearly painted us with one brush, without any regard to actual content. If your catalog is primarily erotic romance and/or erotica – they may have done that with yours as well. If I were you, I’d check.


Unfortunately, I don’t know an easier way to do this, except to check one book at a time. To check what categories your book is in, go to the Kindle book page, and scroll all the way to the bottom of the page. You will see a list of categories your book is in there. If you only see “erotica” listings, your book is in erotica.

So far books have been moved without much rhyme, reason, consistency or transparency. And definitely without any warning. Some authors have had their erotic romance sent into the erotica categories – along with their children’s books and cookbooks!


Hello? Amazon? You in there?

Excessica is a small press – we have 450+ authors in house and about 1000 books. Amazon deciding to put 3/4 of our content into erotica without any warning, and then offering us little or no recourse, is just an unacceptable and unprofessional way to treat content providers. But we all know that while Amazon likes to be known as customer-centric, they don’t treat their workers very well. Or their white-collar employees either, for that matter. Now that Amazon has decided to pay their content providers half-a-cent a page, I’m starting to feel like I’m working in some sort of digital sweatshop. They expect all sorts of exclusivity from us, and put all sorts of restrictions on us, and then pay us a half-penny per page read? Just how long do they thing indies are going to tolerate this kind of treatment?


In my conversation with the Amazon customer service representative about this situation, I was told, “We are improving our ability to identify erotic content, so you’ll see more books put into erotica going forward.”

Me: Just going forward?

CS: No, we’ll also be identifying other content and moving it into the erotica categories.

Me: How will you be identifying this content?

CS: I can’t tell you that.

Me: How can we get our books out of erotica?

CS: You can change the content and resubmit it.

Me: How would we know what to change?

CS: ….

What… the…?


If you find your book(s) in the erotica category and you didn’t place them there, and you believe your book(s) belongs in romance or another category, you can email to ask them to review the book(s).

Why don’t you want your book to stay in erotica? Well, there are a few reasons. But the main one is VISIBILITY. If your book has a tame cover and blurb, it has a clear story, two characters who fall in love, overcome an obstacle, and end up together in the end? Put it in romance. Because by definition, it is romance. Erotic romance, to be sure – but Sylvia Day and E.L. James are in romance, and they write erotic romance. I don’t see them being forced into erotica-only!

What’s so bad about EROTICA as a category? First of all, if your book is put into erotica by Amazon (rather than you choosing the category on your own – and yes, there are some books that do belong there!) you will never be able to change it again without their permission. If your book gets forced into erotica, your KDP dashboard will show the categories you initially chose. But the book page will show “erotica” – and ONLY erotica.

The other problem is, if a book is in erotica, it can’t be in any other secondary category outside of it. It can’t, for example, be in both “romance” and “erotica.” (Not to be confused with erotica>romance, which is still inside the erotica category). It can’t be in both “erotica” and “sci-fi,” for example. Erotica does finally have some sub-categories, but they are definitely located in a red-light district of Amazon’s store. They aren’t searchable from the main book page, until you drill all the way down (pun intended?) to the erotica category itself. So romance as a category has way more eyes on it – your book will be seen by far more readers in romance. And there is plenty of crossover between romance readers and “erotic romance” readers. I would venture to say, except for those who specifically seek out “sweet” (i.e. no-sex or fade-to-black sex) romances, most romance readers expect some sexual content in books in the romance category.

There’s also another problem with Amazon shoving books into erotica, aside from visibility. One of the biggest trends this year has been stepbrother romances. Amazon allowed the first one in romance, and erotica authors were shocked. Up until that moment, we’d been shown that using “familial” words (Daddy, Mom, Brother, Sister, Step-anything) was a blockable offense. Books would be blocked (even if step-father erotica was allowed – and it is) if authors used those words. So we came up with a whole lexicon of words, like “man of the house” for Daddy and “princess” or “brat” for daughter.

Once the stepbrother craze began, erotica authors began trying to put those words in titles again. Some stepbrother books were blocked in erotica – but they sailed through in romance just fine. Clearly the message was “familial” words are fine in romance, but not in erotica. (And I’m calling the “Daddy” craze coming in romance right now… here we go again…!) But check out the list of “bad words” on Amazon in erotica and see if you don’t see the issue here!

So I asked the customer service representative about these kinds of books. I told them that they’d just put books that would be considered blockable by their reviewers into erotica. What happened if I went to make changes on that book a couple weeks from now and new-reviewer Viper from India decided to block it based on the unwritten rules they refuse to tell us? Or if notoriously ham-fisted Carlos F happened to be reviewing and blocked it?

I was told they wouldn’t block books they’d placed in a category.

I laughed.

How would they know??

CS: “Oh we keep records on changes to each book.”

Me: Uh huh. But how do I know your reviewer is going to read and pay attention to them, given your incredible amount of employee turnover? I could be penalized for having that book in an erotica category when you’re the one who put it there!

CS: Oh that wouldn’t happen.

Me: Oh you mean like the last time I had to fight to get a book out of the erotica category, you told me personally none of our catalog would be forced there without notifying us as a publisher…?

CS: Oh. I didn’t… Did I? I don’t believe…

Me: Oh yes you did. So in other words “we wouldn’t do that” until you decide to do that anyway and to hell with whatever you said at the time because technically you don’t have any clear or consistent policies or guidelines, do you? So you can say whatever the hell you want. And you want me to believe you now?

I have been fighting with Amazon for the past week to get many of our books (which belong in romance) back into romance. For example, they put my top 50 bestseller with over 400 reviews, Step Beast, into erotica. Yes, it has sex in it. But it’s not erotica. It’s romance. It belongs (with all the rest of the stepbrother romance) back in the romance category.

They also put my gay romance, One Second Chance, into erotica. It’s most definitely a romance – with a plot. In fact, it was an Epic award winner.

And then this happened. As I was emailing ASINS (Amazon’s book identifiers) back and forth with them, they sent me a list of books that weren’t ours, saying they’d removed the “erotica” restrictions from them. This was their exact email (sic):

After further review, we have decided to remove the search restrictions so your book(s) will now be found in our general product search results. The change takes up to 24 hours to process. Bellow you will find the ASINs and the links showing the books in the Kindle Store with the correct categories.

That was followed by a large list of ASIN identifiers. I started going through the ASINs. None of them were published by Excessica. And they were all extremely explicit! I don’t mean, they might or might not be romance. I mean, they have keyword stuffed titles with explicit descriptions and they are all clearly erotica.

But Amazon decided to put these books back into romance? While refusing to put books like the ones I listed above back into romance?

Here’s one of the books Amazon decided should go back into romance (where it still is, as of this writing, although I don’t expect it to stay there long) but my award-winning gay male romance? Nope.




Then there’s this one. It’s in romance – Amazon put it back into romance, and it’s there as of this writing. But they won’t put my lesbian romance, Stay, which definitely has a plot and a relationship, back into romance.



Wait… what?

And one more example. My book, Surrender of Persephone, a Greek god romance – Amazon has shoved it into erotica. But this book? This book was put back into romance – even with its warning at the end! It’s currently there as of this writing.




And this is only a fraction of the list of titles I have that Amazon put back into the romance categories. I won’t list all of them but I thought it was necessary to list a few to prove a point.

Given Amazon’s actions, I can only conclude that:

a) Since they have no real guidelines about erotica – they tell us “it’s about what you would expect”
b) We have to read between the lines and figure out what Amazon allows, based on what is currently in the category, what they let through, and what they block, ban and adult filter…
It seems, given this list of titles and their descriptions? Amazon apparently “expects” adult diapers, twinks and fisting belong in romance. 
I have no problem with Amazon deciding what is or isn’t “erotica” in their store – if they do so with some consistency and transparency. But as it stands, their slash-and-burn tactics (and I seem to have to write at least one of those pornocalypse posts a year) when it comes to erotica, instead of developing a real solution to the “erotica problem,” only creates more of a mess. Like Smashwords or other retailers, they could solve this problem by allowing customers to decide whether or not they wanted to see “adult” material. It’s as simple as installing a button or toggle switch. But that would mean Amazon would have to admit to selling erotica! *gasp*
The reality is, without clear guidelines, self-published authors and publishers can’t really follow them – and how can Amazon expect dishonest content providers not to take advantage when they provide no structure whatsoever? But instead of being clear, consistent and transparent (why oh why isn’t Amazon run by this guy??) Amazon continues to stick their heads in the sand, pretending nothing is wrong – until they’re forced (for example, when they launch a new Etsy competitor like Handmade or maybe just because Kindlemas is coming!) to clean up the storefront. Then they run around like crazy, targeting the most visible books (like mine and Excessica’s) like a 13-year-old shoving Playboy between his mattress.
I bet Jeff Bezos did that a lot when he was a kid.
Once again. Amazon FAIL.

18 comments to Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us!

  • Barbara  says:

    When I review books on Amazon now they ask me as a reader how explicit scenes were among the other questions. Maybe that’s how they decide what goes to erotica if enough readers say the content was explicit? Just a thought…

  • Kelli Wolfe  says:

    Anyone who didn’t see this coming was willfully blind. I’ve been warning people for months to quit putting “Rough Backdoor Fun with My Two Daddies” into romance. At some point enough readers were going to complain that Amazon was going to have to do something. And we all know that whenever that happens, Amazon tends to massively overreact and the innocent suffer with the guilty.

    The next step will be for every book submitted to go through a full review by a person with a pulse before it goes live, which will add days to the processing time. It will also add a considerable expense to the process – and I certainly don’t believe that Amazon is just going to eat that added cost. It will get passed to the content providers as an up-front fee or reduced royalties. And of course we’ll all get to spend a lot more time with people like CarlosF.

  • Naomi  says:

    Barbara, if that’s the case, I can see how a horror story ended up in the erotica category. Amazon could be asking “explicit” as in sexual graphicness, but “explicit” can also mean violent descriptions, so that’s what the readers could be responding to. But even with that in consideration, sexual (or violent) explicity does not inherently make a book fit those categories, so Amazon needs to adjust whatever their secret methods are.

    The lack of clear communication and pornocalypse scares caused by Amazon’s childishness is just getting tiresome. Just make a fucking adult filter already, all of this could be SO EASILY SOLVED if they just put one in. I don’t understand it.

  • Andrea Dalling  says:

    Being sexually explicit doesn’t make a book erotica. Erotic romance is sexually explicit, but it contains a central love story and an optimistic ending. The romance is the primary focus of the story. But the sex scenes can still be fully dramatized. (They can even include fisting, as long as it’s part of the character development.)

  • […] Pornocalypse 2015 is upon us! […]

  • Donya Lynne  says:

    Amazon needs to stop looking over the shoulders of authors. If they’re concerned about adult content being seen by children, add an adult filter. This should already be happening, anyway, because when I upload a book, I have to set a minimum age for my audience, which I set at 18. Why do I have to answer this question if it doesn’t affect who sees my book and who doesn’t?

    This issue is why Apple is becoming a more favorable site for self-publishers, and I think we’re about to see a major shift in where self-pubbers focus their loyalty. I’m learning that Apple has a much better and more honest platform, and that they do right by both their readers and their authors. This issue is one reason why Apple could be the future of self-publishing. They just don’t seem to have all the hoops authors need to jump through, and they don’t seem as eager to interfere or to circumvent the authors’ decisions regarding categorization, among other things.

  • Best of the Week: Sunday Sex Reads |  says:

    […] and/or erotica – they may have done that with yours as well. If I were you, I’d check.” Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • Best of the Week: Sunday Sex Reads |  says:

    […] and/or erotica – they may have done that with yours as well. If I were you, I’d check.” Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • Amy Valenti  says:

    Thanks for the heads-up, Selena. Godfuckingdamnit, not again…

  • Amazon Is Ghettoizing Romance And Erotica  says:

    […] is now applying them to erotica. According to author Selena Kitt’s blog, Amazon is undergoing a mass re-categorization of books in their catalog, slotting titles into the harder to find “erotica” category without any clear rhyme or reason […]

  • Megan Michaels  says:

    I’ve had two westerns put into Romance (from Erotica), but the first book (my tamest) was kept in Erotica. I have made peace with it, and kinda like having a foot in each camp at this point. It seems to keep each camp alive longer. However, I would have liked to have them ALL in Romance for the obvious reasons you already listed. It is my understanding that (sometimes) the keywords we list help them make their determination. However, in other cases, it seems to not matter a whit. It’s exhausting, trying to understand where they are coming from and the reasoning process they use. Good luck–not only to you and your business, but to all of us.

  • […] erotica. I follow Selena Kitt and she has been a powerful voice in this. Please read her “Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us!” blog […]

  • xxx  says:

    My spouse and І stսmbl&#6513ɗ оѵeг ɦ&#6513ге ɗіffегеnt раge and tҺοuցɦt &#8544 miɡҺt ɑѕ աеll ch&#6513сҝ t&#1211іngѕ
    οսt. I lік&#6513 w&#1211ɑt &#8544 s&#6513е ѕ&#11423 noա
    і’m fоl&#8572օաіng уߋ&#6489.
    &#8556&#11423ߋқ fог&#7457ar&#8574 tߋ &#8572oօкіng at уߋսr &#7457eƅ ρаgе fοг a ѕес&#11423nd time.

  • […] I Write Bisexual Romance (Huffington Post) Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • […] I Write Bisexual Romance (Huffington Post) Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • […] I Write Bisexual Romance (Huffington Post) Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • […] I Write Bisexual Romance (Huffington Post) Pornocalypse 2015 is Upon Us! (Selena […]

  • anonymous  says:

    Amazon’s censorship of erotica is both unnecessary and juvenile. They to grow up and knock off the bullshit.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>